Finland
Northern Ostrobothnia, Finland
Pilot support: RWAC
Challenges: Climate change, food chain carbon footprint, small enterprises in the food sector, low extent of value added.
Strenghts: Public-private sector collaboration; clean raw materials, only few pesticides or medicine needed.
RRI needs: Renewable energy use; Carbon-sequestering production methods; Development of local food chains and further processing of raw materials; Increase of automation.
Barriers of SMEs /Industrial Actors: Enhance processing, develop automation/robotics expertise, optimize production-distribution models, data-driven management, address climate change impacts in food production.
What shapes Finland’s regional food systems?
This section shows key enabling and hindering dynamics in the Finnish food systems transformation, based on a systematic literature review comprising 75 white literature and policy documents.
| Dimensions | What enables innovation | What challenges innovation |
|---|---|---|
| Political |
|
|
| Economic |
|
|
| Social |
|
|
| Technological |
|
|
What do the key actors say?
CIVIL SOCIETY INDUSTRY
- Fragmented multi-level governance and limited
advocacy capacity - Economic uncertainty, unstable budgets, and
weak market competitiveness - Misalignment between policy, public
perceptions, and agricultural realities - Limited data access constrains advocacy
- Multi-stakeholder collaboration drives
transformation
INDUSTRY
- Entrepreneurship-friendly and green transition policies
support innovation, but regulatory complexity and nonuniform standards create operational burdens - Slow public procurement and bureaucratic funding slow innovation
- New distribution models and partnerships address
labour and market shifts - Digitalisation and automation improve efficiency
Academia research
- Stable regional collaborations and strong industry ties enable applied, practice-oriented research
- Short-term and fragmented funding complicates longterm planning and limits sustainable SME engagement
- Educational programmes and research networks
strengthen innovation capacity and knowledge exchange - Technology development advances through
demonstration projects, but low SME participation remains
a bottleneck
PUBLIC AUTHORITY
- EU funding plays a key role in enabling experimentation,
digitalisation, and sustainability initiatives - Fragmented regulations and rigid administrative procedures hinder implementation and small-actor participation
- Workforce shortages and demographic decline,challenge long-term system capacity
- Digital advisory platforms, precision agriculture, and
regional innovation projects support optimism around
future transition
Key reccomendations to accelerate the transition
Simplify funding & bureaucracy
→ Provide micro-grants and
SME support for sustainable food pilots
Create regional food platforms
→ Develop food councils or living labs to align
municipalities, research, business, NGOs
Prioritise multi stakeholder collaborations over
short-term success
→ Reward experimentation, cross-sectoral learning
and multi-actor initiatives
Support intermediaries
→ Establish innovation brokers or local
champions to facilitating partnerships and
innovation
Build shared roadmaps
→ Visualize milestones and bridge policypractice
gaps
Innovate and simplify regulations
→ Support sector guidance, training, and
regulatory sandboxes for food innovation